Constitution of Pennsylvania 1776

Pennsylvania's original constitution like Maryland's and Delaware's acknowledges the generally held beliefs of the people who wrote it which is explicitly general but not denominational or sectarian Christianity. To them, founding their state on the principle's for human government and human relationships as found in tried and tested Biblical principles is not the "establishment" of religion. This constitution lays out what they considered the establishment of religion as described in the commentary on the state constitutions page. Meaning; to them the establishment of religion is the state interfering in the growth of the government of God in the hearts of individuals that comes through Gospel of Jesus Christ. (As written in the New and Old Testaments.) That was their experience under the oppression of the King of England's imperil church and before that the imperial church of the Roman Empire. This state was to be founded by the best of standards individuals could hold within their hearts through the influence of heaven itself and not through the coercive nature of human government. In section 45 the states role is laid out in this. Not in the preaching of that Gospel or the advancement of the religion but in the enforcement of law. The standard of law was much higher than the modern secularist and sexualist like to have it. The guideline's are unambiguously in line with the morality that Jesus Christ himself and his apostles preached that were to be the fruit in the lives of peoples enlightened by the message in the Old and New Testaments of the Bible. In other words these peoples understood that vice and sexual immorality (and obviously other lawlessness) were in fact the enemies of the people, freedom and good\limited government. This also exposes the strategy of the modern leftist. Vice, sexual and other types of immorality are their most effective tools in their bid for political and eventual military domination. Not content to simply spread their corruption they seek to impose it with the force of law. Part of that strategy is the use of "law" to takeover, and\or the imposition of a public school system that censors the Christian heritage of the nation. That way when believers and like minded individuals resist their agenda they can be painted as "radicals" who seek to impose a "theocracy" like the Roman Empire's imperial church on the nation. This becomes very easy for them to do because the publically educated people of the nation have nothing in their knowledge of the present or past to measure the accusations against. A case and point outside these glaringly obvious state constitutions themselves is who was the president of Pennsylvania's constitutional convention, Benjamin Franklin. Mr. Franklin is one of two known Deists among the main founders of the nation. Therefore he along with Thomas Jefferson are held up by modern leftists as the epitome of what the nations founders believed, which according to them of course is humanistic secularism. Yet here the "Deist" Franklin was president of the convention that wrote the document below that if written today would be hysterically denounced by the modern left leaning politician and their allies in the media as expressesing the most "extreme" "right wing" "Christian vitriol" imaginable.